Lidl is right in black or white
Doubt has also been cast on an internal decision to burnish corporate morals. Even a recent move by the c-suite towards a less formal management culture has been teased without mercy. But an apology is now called for: Lidl has proved that a leopard can change its spots.
How did this conversion of Saul to Paul on the journalist road to Damascus come about? A threat of legal action? A chummy lunch with the publisher? The promise of a job in the press department? No, Lidl has revealed its moral integrity through the eloquence of action.
The above fashion ad used by the privately-run company to sell its sweatshirts in the Czech Republic may look harmless enough to Anglo-Saxon or German readers, but it has created a storm in the social media. The discounter's local website has been bombarded by complaints from an irate segment of Czech consumers who do not approve the use of a black model in an advertising brochure.
The ad agency commissioned by Lidl probably thought that a black model would add street cred to a young fashion product. This is a fair enough assumption, given the incredible talent black people have shown in the US music industry. Sadly, however, the pigment of a man's skin has been interpreted by some as a battle cry.
Logic of the tribe
The worst online complaints are unrepeatable, but their general tenor is to accuse Lidl of forcing multiculturalism down customer throats.
Without wishing to give this depressing bout of xenophobia an intellectual gloss it doesn't deserve, the abuse is almost certainly linked to broader political and social phenomena far beyond the control of any retailer. These include resurgent nationalism in the West, most noticeably in the US, the UK, France, Central & Eastern Europe, Russia and Turkey; a general malaise concerning globalisation; and waves of refugees and economic migrants into the EU with a small, but deadly undercurrent.
Admirably, Lidl as an international retailer has refused to cave in and change its advertising in order to please the critics. This compares favourably with one overwhelmed J. Sainsbury store manager in London who tried to appease anti-Israel protesters in August 2014 by withdrawing kosher food from the shelves. Inevitably the decision antagonised the Jewish community.
Lidl's decision shows spunk because mass retailers can obviously only thrive if they keep the vast majority of people happy within each store catchment area.
Put more simply still: Should grocers strive to be a moral force or stick to selling sugar and rice? Visionaries such as Gottlieb Duttweiler or John Spedam Lewis wanted retailing to have a strong ethical basis, but they lived in far less complex times.
In today's visceral and increasingly politicised world every product and every marketing image is capable of provoking howls of outrage from one section of society or another. The moral dilemma of the J. Sainsbury manager in London is a case in point: There was no choice that could have been made that would have satisfied both parties.
So Lidl has decided to become ethical in an age of increasing moral ambiguity. How it must long for the days when it was a roughneck...
Podcast. Click arrow to listen to an audio version of the text: